Civil Society

Pillar 02: Beyond Stereotypes — What Fieldwork in Hokkaido Taught Me About Cultural Complexity

Designing a bilingual survey in Taiwan was a start, but executing field research in Hokkaido was a real-world reality check. When I first approached locals at Hokkaido University in English, I was met with constant rejections.I realized that approaching Japanese locals in English forced an unintended barrier upon them. Adapting immediately, I learned basic, polite Japanese greetings (“Are dake o-jikan wo itadaitemo yoroshii desu ka?”) to bridge the gap. The atmosphere shifted instantly. People stopped, listened, and shared their genuine thoughts. I learned that to understand a culture, you must first respect its emotional and linguistic landscape.

High Interest vs. Media Stereotypes: 72% of respondents (18 out of 25) reported a high level of political interest (rating 4 or 5 out of 5). They were far from “cold” or “apathetic”.

The Efficacy Divide: While 56% believed elections influence national policy, 44% held significant reservations (rating 2 or 3 out of 5).

Qualitative open-ended responses in my dataset exposed the human reality behind these numbers—a structural trap known as “Silver Democracy”:

“In Japan, the young population is very small compared to the elderly. Because many politicians advocate policies that benefit seniors, not many people vote for youth-centered issues. That is why I feel politics won’t change much even if we vote.”— Female University Student Respondent

“I feel casting a single vote won’t make a big difference or change other people’s minds.”— Male Grade 10 Student Respondent

Conversely, other respondents provided strategic counter-perspectives on civic leverage:

“I vote because politicians only create policies targeting the age groups that actually turn out to vote.”— Male University Student Respondent

“Even if individual power is small, Japan will never change unless each person takes responsibility to think about politics step by step.”— Female Working Adult Respondent

What external media labels as “youth apathy” is not laziness or indifference. It is a rational, structural reaction to demographic skew. Young people feel trapped in a system where their demographic minority status diminishes their electoral leverage, generating systemic frustration rather than genuine coldness.

Final Exhibition Poster, Global Youth Citizen Program (Hokkaido University)

Beyond the social insights, this project was a powerful reality check regarding my own academic toolkit:

Realizing that academic insights shouldn’t stay buried in spreadsheets, I synthesized our field data into analytical posters. Driven to share these findings, I competed for and was appointed as the Primary Exhibition Curator for the final program showcase.

In this role, I designed the visual narrative and infographics, translating complex demographic data into an engaging exhibition for the entire school community—transitioning from field researcher to public communicator.

Recognizing my presentation skills, the Taipei City Department of Education invited me to serve as a student mentor for junior high school students. In this role, I led workshops and guided younger learners through their self-directed projects:

Workshop Facilitation: Taught junior high students how to structure inquiry projects and build compelling slides.

Mentorship & Certification: Guided teams all the way to their official final showcase, earning an official mentorship certification.

This journey taught me that real academic inquiry isn’t about having all the answers, but asking better questions. Moving forward, I am committed to ongoing intellectual inquiry—using my weekly perspective column as a living archive to continuously observe, analyze, and write about pressing global and cultural challenges.

在〈Pillar 02: Beyond Stereotypes — What Fieldwork in Hokkaido Taught Me About Cultural Complexity〉中留言功能已關閉